Volume 45, No. 1 February 2010
Click on title below to view abstract
Full Text Available
Here
CEO Pay-For-Performance Heterogeneity Using Quantile
Regression
Kevin F. Hallock, Regina Madalozzo, Clayton G.
Reck
Signaling, Free Cash Flow and "Nonmonotonic" Dividends
Kathleen Fuller, Benjamin M. Blau
Dividends versus Share Repurchases Evidence from Canada:
1985–2003
Maher Kooli, Jean-Francois L’Her
The Ex-dividend Day: Action On and Off the Danish
Exchange
Umid Akhmedov, Keith Jakob
Debt Issuance in the Face of Tax Loss Carryforwards
Anne-Marie Anderson, Nandu Nayar
Investors' Use of Historical Forecast Bias to Adjust
Current Expectations
Seung-Woog (Austin) Kwag, Ronald E. Shrieves
Changes in the Information Efficiency of Stock Prices:
Additional Evidence
Richard A. DeFusco, Suchi Mishra, K. Raghunandan
Predictability in Consumption Growth and Equity Returns:
A Bayesian Investigation
Alex Paseka, George Theocharides
A Note on Affordability and the Optimal Share Price
William T. Chittenden, Janet D. Payne, J. Holland
Toles
CEO Pay-For-Performance Heterogeneity Using Quantile
Regression
Kevin F. Hallock, Regina Madalozzo, Clayton G.
Reck
We provide some examples of how quantile regression can
be used to investigate heterogeneity in pay-firm size
and pay-performance relationships for U.S. CEOs. For
example, do conditionally (predicted) high-wage managers
have a stronger relationship between pay and performance
than conditionally low-wage managers? Our results using
data over a decade show, for some standard
specifications, there is considerable heterogeneity in
the returns-to-firm performance across the conditional
distribution of wages. Quantile regression adds
substantially to our understanding of the
pay-performance relationship. This heterogeneity is
masked when using more standard empirical techniques.
KEYWORDS
executive compensation • quantile regression • pay and
performance
Signaling, Free Cash Flow and "Nonmonotonic" Dividends
Kathleen Fuller, Benjamin M. Blau
Many argue that dividends signal future earnings or
dispose of excess cash. Empirical support is
inconclusive, potentially because no model combines both
rationales. This paper does. Higher quality firms pay
dividends to eliminate the free cash-flow problem, while
firms that outsiders perceive as lower quality pay
dividends to signal future earnings and reduce the free
cash-flow problem. In equilibrium, dividends are
nonmonotonic with respect to the signal observed by
outsiders; the highest quality firms pay smaller
dividends than lower perceived quality firms. The model
reconciles the existing literature and generates new
empirical predictions that are tested and supported.
KEYWORDS
dividend signaling models • agency conflicts •
monotonicity condition • payout policy • cash-flow
uncertainty
Dividends versus Share Repurchases Evidence from Canada:
1985–2003
Maher Kooli, Jean-Francois L’Her
This paper provides out-of-sample evidence on the payout
policy in Canada during the 1985–2003 period. First, we
show that the proportion of nonfinancial firms paying
dividends has decreased, while the proportion initiating
repurchase programs has increased. We also show that
Canadian firms paying dividends and repurchasing shares
are extremely concentrated. Second, we focus on the
factors that could affect the choice between repurchases
and dividends. We find that dividends and repurchases
are used by different types of firms. While we do not
confirm the financial flexibility hypothesis, our
results are consistent with the substitution hypothesis
after controlling for selection bias and endogeneity.
KEYWORDS
payout policy • share repurchases • dividends
The Ex-dividend Day: Action On and Off the Danish
Exchange
Umid Akhmedov, Keith Jakob
We examine ex-dividend day behavior on the Copenhagen
Stock Exchange. We report price-drop ratios of 32% and
18% for close-to-close and close-to-open samples,
respectively, well below the ratios observed in the
United States. Our findings are generally consistent
with limit order adjustment explanations from recent
literature. In Denmark, a unique average price trading
opportunity makes it possible for investors to capture
dividends without directly altering supply or demand in
the regular market, and therefore not necessarily
driving the price-drop ratios toward one.
KEYWORDS
ex-dividend day • average price trading • dividend
arbitrage • dividend capture trade • illiquid markets
Debt Issuance in the Face of Tax Loss Carryforwards
Anne-Marie Anderson, Nandu Nayar
We examine the market impact of issuances of public and
private debt by firms with sizeable tax loss
carryforwards (TLCFs). Public issuances are met with a
significantly negative stock price reaction, while
private placements are associated with a positive
marginally significant stock price reaction. After
controlling for asymmetric information proxies, the
stock price reaction to the debt issuance is more
negative, the larger the TLCF. The evidence suggests
that debt financing is suboptimal when issuers have
large TLCFs, which in turn, supports the relevance of
taxes for debt usage.
KEYWORDS
asymmetric information • capital structure • corporate
debt offering • event studies • nondebt tax shields •
taxes
Investors' Use of Historical Forecast Bias to Adjust
Current Expectations
Seung-Woog (Austin) Kwag, Ronald E. Shrieves
We explore the extent to which investor response to
earnings information differs in the presence of
historical bias in earnings forecasts. Overall, the
results are consistent with the notion that investors
take historical forecast bias into account when
interpreting information in earnings announcements and
that the market's reaction to forecast errors is larger
(less negative) when forecasts are historically more
optimistic and suggests that the functional form
commonly used in the earnings response literature does
not appropriately capture the effect of real unexpected
earnings information (i.e., investors' expectation
errors as opposed to analysts' forecast errors) on stock
returns.
KEYWORDS
earnings forecasts • investor expectation • historical
bias • market reaction
Changes in the Information Efficiency of Stock Prices:
Additional Evidence
Richard A. DeFusco, Suchi Mishra, K. Raghunandan
Previous research shows, using data from three quarters
after the implementation of regulation fair disclosure
(Reg FD), that there is an improvement in the
informational efficiency of stock prices after Reg FD.
We compare the informational efficiency of stock prices
in four pre-Reg FD quarters (1999–2000) and 12 post-Reg
FD quarters (2002–2005). The improvement in the
informational efficiency of stock prices previously
reported in the immediate aftermath of Reg FD persists
in later periods.
KEYWORDS
regulation FD • information asymmetry • earnings
announcements • SEC regulations • stock market
efficiency
Predictability in Consumption Growth and Equity Returns:
A Bayesian Investigation
Alex Paseka, George Theocharides
We use a Bayesian method to estimate a consumption-based
asset pricing model featuring long-run risks. Although
the model is generally consistent with consumption and
dividend growth moments in annual data, the conditional
mean of consumption growth (a latent process) is not
persistent enough to satisfy the restriction that the
price-dividend ratio be an affine function of the latent
process. The model also requires relatively high
intertemporal elasticity of substitution to match the
low volatility of the risk-free return. These two
restrictions lead to the equity volatility puzzle. The
model accounts for only 50% of the total variation in
asset returns.
KEYWORDS
consumption-based asset pricing • consumption growth
predictability • return predictability • equity
volatility puzzle
A Note on Affordability and the Optimal Share Price
William T. Chittenden, Janet D. Payne, J. Holland
Toles
Despite the increase in institutional ownership,
decreased trading costs, and increased real personal
savings, we find that the average stock price is lower
today than it was in the 1920s. In the aggregate, the
propensity to split is a function of recent market
performance, personal savings, and the desirability of
appearing to be a small firm. Our results indicate that,
after decades of inflation and the average stock price
falling, splitting stocks to return to an "affordable"
trading range must be rejected as an explanation. This
suggests that other economic forces are behind splits,
whether traditional or behavioral in nature.
KEYWORDS
stock price • stock splits • real stock price •
diversification
