Vol. 34, No. 3 -
August 1999
Click Title to view abstract
"The Industry Effects Regarding the Probability of
Takeovers"
Aigbe Akhigbe and Jeff Madura
"Private Placement of Common Equity and Earnings
Expectations"
Jeremy Goh, Michael J. Gombola, Hei Wai Lee and
Feng-Ying Liu
"Examining the Impact of the 1986 Tax Reform Act on
Corporate Dividend Policy: A New Methodology"
K. Mike Casey, Dwight C. Anderson, Hani I. Mesak
and Ross N. Dickens
"A
Cross-Sectional Empirical Test of a Dual-State
Multi-Factor Pricing Model"
Shelly W. Howton and David R. Peterson
"An Empirical Examination of the Nasdaq/CHX Dual-Trading
Experiment"
Bonnie F. Van Ness, Robert A. Van Ness, and
Stephen W. Pruitt
Katherine J. Wilkinson, Lawrence C. Rose and
Martin R. Young
"Futures Commitments and Commodity Price Jumps"
Arjun Chatrath and Frank Song
"Price Elasticity of Demand and an Optimal Cash Discount
Rate in Credit Policy"
Muhammad Rashid and Devashis Mitra
"The Industry
Effects Regarding the Probability of Takeovers"
Aigbe Akhigbe and Jeff Madura
Volume 34, No. 3, pp. 1-18
· Abstract: This
study attempts to determine whether an acquisition
announcement signals potential gains to the
corresponding industry rivals of the target, and whether
these gains can be explained by industry-specific and
rival firm-specific factors that reflect the likelihood
of a takeover.
The research finds that the valuation
effects of the target, combined acquirer and target, and
industry rivals of the target are positive and
significant. The mean variant effects per corresponding
industry are significantly related to industry-specific
characteristics that reflect the probability of a
takeover. Specifically, industries characterized as
having a higher level of free cash flow, a higher level
of tangible assets, and a smaller market value
experience a more favorable revaluation.
A supplemental analysis of the
individual rival firms is also conducted, since the
variation in the valuation effects between rival firms
within each of the industries is distinctly different
from the variation of mean industry effect across
industries. The analysis of the individual rivals finds
that the same rival-specific variables are significant
and in the same direction as the analysis of the
industry-specific variables. In addition, the valuation
effects of individual rivals are also inversely related
to their previous performance. Overall, the results
suggest that industry-specific and rival firm-specific
characteristics that reflect a higher probability of a
takeover are important in explaining acquisition gains
and motivation.
"Private Placement
of Common Equity and Earnings Expectations"
Jeremy Goh, Michael J. Gombola, Hei Wai Lee and
Feng-Ying Liu
Volume 34, No. 3, pp. 19-32
· Abstract: We
examine earnings forecast revisions by analysts
subsequent to the announcement of private equity
placements. Results show that analysts make significant
upward revisions to their forecasts for current-year
earnings. Furthermore, these forecast revisions are
significantly related to announcement-period abnormal
returns, but not t the risk changes accompanying the
equity placement. These findings are consistent with the
information hypothesis, which suggests that private
equity placements convey favorable information about
future earnings.
"Examining the
Impact of the 1986 Tax Reform Act on Corporate Dividend
Policy: A New Methodology"
K. Mike Casey, Dwight C. Anderson, Hani I. Mesak
and Ross N. Dickens
Volume 34, No. 3, pp. 33-46
· Abstract: The
article introduces a new methodology to investigate the
effects of the 1986 Tax Reform Act (TRA) on corporate
dividend policy. The methodology employs a modified
version of Rozeff's (1982) model to control for the
potential effects of underlying influential variables.
The empirical results show there is no widespread
reaction to the 1986 TRA passage on the aggregate level
of dividends and only modest support for an
industry-related dividend effect. We also find that firm
size does not play a significant role in dividend policy
reaction to the 1986 TRA.
"A Cross-Sectional
Empirical Test of a Dual-State Multi-Factor Pricing
Model"
Shelly W. Howton and David R. Peterson
Volume 34, No. 3, pp. 47-64
· Abstract: During
empirical testing of the Capital Asset Pricing Model an
assumption is typically made that risk is
intertemporally constant. However, prior research finds
that risk changes over time. We empirically test a
conditional dual-state cross-sectional model allowing
risk to change through prior identification of different
market and economic states. We examine relationships
between returns and conditional market and
economic-factor betas, size, book-to-market equity, and
earnings-price ratios. We find that relationships shift
across regimes, suggesting the importance of a
conditional, as opposed to unconditional, model.
Relationships also change in January.
"An Empirical
Examination of the Nasdaq/CHX Dual-Trading Experiment"
Bonnie F. Van Ness, Robert A. Van Ness, and
Stephen W. Pruitt
Volume 34, No. 3, pp. 65-78
· Abstract: We
analyze the effects of the SEC's experimental Nasdaq/CHX
dual-trading program. The program, which began in 1987
and continues to the present, establishes an experiment
in which the costs and benefits of competition between
dealer and specialist market structures can be observed
directly. Our primary finding is that the program led to
significantly reduced mean quoted and percentage spreads
for the dual-traded issues. Further, even though the CHX
specialists quote lower spreads, they are not able to
garner a significant number of trades from Nasdaq.
"Comparing the
Effectiveness of Traditional and Time Varying Hedge
Ratios Using New Zealand and Australian Debt Futures
Contracts
Katherine J. Wilkinson, Lawrence C. Rose and
Martin R. Young
Volume 34, No. 3, pp. 79-94
· Abstract: We apply
cointegration methodology to the New Zealand and
Australian 90-day, three-year and 10-year debt and
futures markets. We compare traditional methods of
calculating hedge ratios with those computed by using
univariate and multivariate error correction models. We
use out-of-sample forecasting to determine which
approach is the most effective. Contrary to recent
research, our results show that univariate and
multivariate error correlation models do not outperform
more traditional methods of constructing hedges.
"Futures Commitments
and Commodity Price Jumps"
Arjun Chatrath and Frank Song
Volume 34, No. 3, pp. 95-112
· Abstract: We
examine the relationship between the commitments of
three of the largest groups of futures traders and the
abnormal price movements in five agricultural
commodities. The general evidence suggests that the
commitments of futures traders have been increasing over
time, whereas the frequency of price jumps have not.
Regression results indicate a negative relationship
between price jumps and the commitments of speculators
and small traders. There is also evidence of a negative
relationship between the number of speculators and cash
market volatility, consistent with a host of
speculation-based theories.
"Price Elasticity of
Demand and an Optimal Cash Discount Rate in Credit
Policy"
Muhammad Rashid and Devashis Mitra
Volume 34, No. 3, pp. 113-126
· Abstract: While
the provision of a cash discount is equivalent to a
reduction in price, the role of price elasticity of
demand in determining credit terms has been neglected in
the extant literature. In this paper, this role is
investigated and it is shown that the optimal cash
discount rate is affected by the price elasticity of
demand for the firm's product. The comparative effects
on the optimal cash discount rate with respect to
exogenous changes in the fraction of credit sales paid
after taking cash discount, the cost of short-term funds
and the bad debt loss ratio are investigated. A
trade-off between the time value gain and the price
elasticity of demand is established. We find that firms
which sell in locations having different price
elasticities for their products, and/or which face
various costs of short-term funds in different
locations, should vary their cash discount terms
accordingly.
